Customer Reviews
Isn't life funny? - By: Zen King, 19 Sep 2008 
I too had to read it more than once...
What's the point of the author indulgingin a 'Chautauqua' on 'Romantic' & 'Classic' 'Values', with the resultant (extravagant) soliloquy on the 'Value' of 'Quality', when the author can't even work out how to relate to his own child (who having spent the majority of his formative yearsin apparent mental turmoil - brought on by the behaviour of the author, as describedin this book - was murderedin San Francisco 2 weeks before his 23rd birthday)?
This book is just another example of self-indulgence sold off as enlightenment...
What's the point? There is NO point.
I need 7 stars!!! ----->-->--,--'--@ - By: P. Garcia, 11 Jul 2008 
Yeah, I am not very good at writting reviews but there you go...
This book is the kind that you borrow, read almost twice, slowly, & then you have to buy it to finish reading it the second time! The adventure, the trip is not just any trip, sprinkled with philosophy, sense of humour, & mechanics. I must say, that I never owned a cycle, & I probably never will, they scare me to death! Although I secretly love see them go past, & I would have so much enjoyed a trip like this with this guyin a classic Harley!! Oh yeah! hehe
Also, the amount of laughter & food for thoughtin it, & the glow of the main character made me love him dearly very earlyin the book, is a very caring, sometimes moody character, but his heart is real goldin powder.
I needed to have this book with me, besides my bed at night, or wherever; it is a reminder of how good is to be human after all (with or without greasy hands) ;-P
Summarising LOL, is entertaining, relaxing, & very well written. It is not only a book, for me it has become a friend.
A "Da Vinci Code " for the 1970s - By: Wolf, 07 Jul 2008 
I read this years ago, when I was studying Greek & Latin literature & Philosophy at university, & dismissed it more or less out of hand.
Coming back to it as a 40 year old father (the same age as Pirsig was when he made the journey depictedin the novel with his son)I found much more to enjoy & be affected byin the story itself. There is no doubt that the theme of the alienated son & father being reunited recalls that of the Odyssey & is genuinely moving, if clumsily resolved.
As for the philosophy, well, Pirsig admits without any embarrassmentin his 1999 introduction to the book that, at the time of writing, he thought, quite incorrectly, that Phaedrus means wolfin Classical Greek. If you can't deal with a word like wolf, you won't exaclty handle mythos, logos or the technical termsin philosophical writing. If someone who clearly has no Greek at all wishes to pass himself off as an authority on the Pre-Socratics, or Plato, or Aristotle, that is just a bit embarrassing, really, & tells you all you need to know about how seriously to take his views.
Therefore the book strikes me as a (very superior, admittedly) Da Vinci Code for its day - a good story ornamented with some specious learning, & none the worse for that, as long as it is not taken seriously.
If Pirsig wants us to walk away thinking we should apply ourselves to our work a bit more & generally try harder, that is no bad thing, & as he admits himself, nobody would disagree with the message, but don't go looking for any great secret of life here. It is just a nice book.
The hallmarks of a good read, but.... - By: A. Furse, 25 May 2008 This appears to have all the hallmarks of a good read for me: I'm very interestedin philosophy, psychology, travel (plus a bit of a hippie so I'm sure there's a latent Buddhistin me somewhere). However, after trying this twice - & putting it down both times, never to be picked up again - I just can't see what the hype is about & am left wondering who this book actually appeals to. There doesn't seem to be anything vivid, interesting, or gripping about it. One of those books that I wanted to like so much, but found incredibly disappointing. Over-rated.
Over Rated. - By: Ron Labbatt, 18 Jan 2008 I bought & read this a few years back. The main reason was because it was highly recommended by some university types. I'm going to draw some flak on this review, because if you don't give it a 5, everyone thinks your a shallow pulp novel individual (which may be the case to a certain extent)...
The simple truth was that I couldn't really engage with the central character. Yes, there are a few moments of clarity - like when he discusses making parts himself. Unfortunately, the best elements become subsumedin a relatively dull life story. In other words, I found it dragged a bit. I didn't expect loads of action, but I did expect there to be a good deal more practical activity & a good deal less introspective discussion. I've got sympathy for the lead character (the author, as it turns out) - I just didn't enjoy his journey. The whole trip went nowhere & no-one seemed to have very much fun. Maybe I'm not supposed to have enjoyed reading it?
