Customer Reviews
One of the best overviews of Modern Architecture available - By: James Ferguson, 26 Feb 2002 
In covering well-trodden ground, William Curtis still manages to shed new light on the subject of Modern Architecture. Much has been written over the years, including Sigfried Giedion's seminal work, Space Time & Architecture, which sought to give Modern Architecture its proper perspective. Mr. Curtis seems greatly beholden to Giedion, especiallyin his interpretations of Le Corbusier, which comprise a sizeable chunk of this volume. Mr. Curtis downplays the polemics & focuses more on the individual contributions of an incredibly broad range of architects from the early 19th century to the present day.
Wonderful chapters encapsulate the various movements such as his piece on the Revolutionary Architecture of Russia, & how these ideas filtered through the various European architectural movements. He also covers the diaspora of Russian avant-garde architects,in subsequent chapters, to Germany, England, Israel & the United States & the tremendous impact they hadin these countries.
However, the main focus is the wayin which Modern architecture was constantly being reshaped into a regional architecture, highlighting such major figures as Alvar Aalto, Luis Barrigan, & Oscar Niemeyer, all of whom owed some debt to Le Corbusier.
This is a very even-handed account, perhaps too even-handed at times. It is a most valuable resource for anyone interestingin Modern architecture & the many forms & variations that it has taken over the 20th century.
A good book ! - By: , 12 Mar 1999 
A good price for a book that all architecture students should have.
Exhausting rather than exhaustive - By: , 30 Jul 1998 
This is the 3rd edition of this book, & Curtis has certainly expanded his knowledge, to encompass areas of the world not coveredin previous editions. In all fairness this is a useful primer for undergraduate students (though one is fearful that they will cling to Curtis's stereotypes), & the book is worth buying just for the chapters on Le Corbusier alone - Curtis being without doubt a major authority on Le Corbusier. But most of the other chapters are very thin & stero-typed. Curtis says that great architecture is felt with the heart, which is why he needs to see every building he writes about - a very fair & worthy comment - & yet he more or less reproduces received history, & clings to stereotypes; German Nazi architecture, for instance, is seen as very bad - even though of course one can only inspect them via photographs, as they were destroyedin the 2nd WW, BECAUSE they were Nazis. I have a particular interestin Finnish architecture, & was amazed t! o see that he has gotten one of the key names completely wrong! He writes about the constructivist architecture of Vormala, whenin fact Vormala was not a constructivist; the person he really means is Vormala's former partner Heikki Kairamo!
