Customer Reviews
Entertaining and informative - By: AH, London, 07 Oct 2008 
I really enjoyed this book . Obviously you can't expect to have a very detailed account of 2000 years of historyin just over 500 pages, but I found it informativein that there were a lot of things I didn't know. OK, perhaps some of them weren't really worth knowing, & maybe the historica acuracy was questionablein places, but as a light-hearted 'potted history' I thought it worked well. Humour is very subjective & I see that several reviewers of this book didn't think it was at all funny, but I was quite amused & after I'd read out several 'funny bits' to my husband he decided he had to read it for himself. He wasn't as enthusiastic as me as he prefers more heavyweight reading, but I really enjoyed it. As someone else has said, history books can be very dry & boring & this was a refreshing change.
Not as funny as it thinks it is... - By: C. Ball, 21 Sep 2008 
This book is not as funny as it thinks it is. In the preface the author claims it is very different from the classic 1066 & All That. I would agree. That one was funny & just the right length. This I found too long. About two thirds of the way through it was becoming a real slog. Yes, there were parts that made me snort with laughter, but by & large it was a bit tedious & I really had to digin deep to force myself to finish it.
The history, man - By: C. Young, 14 Sep 2008 It is a sad commentary on the teaching profession that so many English people find their own history so boring. The Irish, Welsh & Scots endlessly argue about their history & what it says about their current situation, but English people generally are pretty ignorant about what makes them, well, English. John O'Farrell has a mission to re-ignite some interest & understanding this actually quite gripping subject. He re he takes on the persona of an enthusiastic young-ish history teacher, probably wearing a wooly jumper, to re-tell the last 2000 years of British (or as he confesses, mostly English) history. He spices up the tale throughout with mock-dialogue, pop culture references & anachronous quips. Surprisingly this doesn't get wearing, though this is a long book. The story is fairly conventionally told, all kings & queens & great men, no space for revisionism & only odd flashes of explanation. Nonetheless it reads like a novel & throughout there is a firm insight into the arbitrary lottery of history. The book concludes at the end of the Second World War, undoubtedly Britain's `finest hour' & therefore on an upbeat & surprisingly nationalist note.
Accessible History - By: RB, 12 Sep 2008 
British history for me is endless dull school lessons spent gazing out of the window at the sports fields wishing I was out there. Don't ask me about what happenedin the 1900 or so years of British history not covered by WWI, the industrial revolution or the cholera outbreak of the 1850s.
I have picked up & put down a number of different books on British history including Simon Schama's History of Britain & This Sceptred Isle, but have found them impenetrable never progressing beyond the Danelaw. This book however is very easy to read, (I am told) is accurate & funny (unfortunately all too rarein history books).
Tiresome - By: P. Foster, 05 Sep 2008 
Just a pain to read - contains fake conversations throughout imagining what people might have said at the time. These are not funny & just get irritating. Missed opportunity.
