Customer Reviews
A great read but dont confuse it with the childrens version! - By: penash, 03 Nov 2008 
I read this book whilst on a round the world trip & it was a great companion, although it does take some reading!
I ordered a copy from Amazon for my fatherin law as a christmas present, but thought i would get the hardback version called 'a really short history of nearly everything'... a note of caution, this is the childrens much abridged & illustrated version & not the same as the paperback. i have decided to keep this however for my 10 yr old god son as this book is fascinating for all ages & it is great that the kids can read it too!
Overrated - By: Alex Ireland, 23 Sep 2008 
I am skeptical of journalists or writers who think they can write a book about anything. Yeah sure they've a great gift for writing but that doesn't mean they have a great gift for understanding & explaining what it is they are writing about.
I really can't fathom thatin a book which attempts to cover most of science, the scientific method itself isn't even explained. This means the mechanism which establishes science as most objective & reliable paradigm we have for establishing objective truth about the universe is omitted. Now, there's a countless amount of facts, dates, figures & 'imagine this' type stuff all there with the assumed intent of making a reader go wow. All very well, some of it will fuse the imagination, but let's not forget that the scientific method is what defines science. Without it, we have no way of differentiating between science & psuedo-science, no way of differentiating the reliability of the big bang theory & crystal healers.
Too many times, instead of explaining principles & concepts, Bryson opts for facts about dates. It really doesn't matter if it was 1915, 1916, or 1917 when Einstein published his theory on general relativity what matters is what it is saying, the concepts that underpin it & why we can be confident it's correct. In this regard, Byrson comes up well short. Someone like Simon Singh, Stephen Hawking, or just about anyone with scientific training does a much better job.
Sometimes he's just way off. For example, when he discusses the theory of evolution which is just as sound as the theory of gravityin terms of the scientific method, since both are testifiable, falsifiable, have huge amounts of evidence (one billion+ fossils & infinite amount of DNA evidence), been through the same peer reviewing processes etc. So,in scientific terms doubting evolution is like doubting gravity.
His misunderstanding insinutates that the lack of fossils foundin human evolution may cast doubt on the theory. He fails to point out the probability of fossilation is only about 1 / million & the probability of finding one about the same, which by simple mathematics make every fossil find of our ancestors species a miraclein statistical terms? He also fails to include that the DNA evidence is conclusive & all of it is consistent with evolution through natural selection. DNA vindicated Darwin.
If you want a pop Science book so that you can understand science just skip this book. Science is a very broad area now. Expertsin Physics are not expertsin Biology. Expertsin Biology are not expertsin Physics. A writer with no scientific expertise is certainly not an expertin anything scientific. If you really want to understand science, pick a branch of science & then pick the appropriate expert. Someone like Feymen for Physics, Dawkins for Biology or Hawking for the Universe.
Before you do any of that, make sure you understand the scientific method as described by Karl Popper. This is the framework that underpins all science & what makes science an exceptionally reliable paradigm. It's why planes fly & why we know the origins of all species on our planet.
If you couldn't give a monkeys about understanding & just want lots of scientific trivial, dates & names, well then, sadly this book could be a runner.
Essential introduction to science! - By: P. Garcia, 23 Sep 2008 
This book is not only highy educational, but very entertaining, & Bryson's writting style makes it fun, & it keeps you craving for more.
If would be a good idea to make this read a compulsory High School one, to excite the curiosity & the thirst for knowledge of our students, considering the fact that the more we know, the more we love.
It is a nearly complete & thorough overview on the main principles of science. Wery well informed with plenty of historical anecdotes & curiosities. I have learned & laughed so much!!!
A genius's work.
Not for me - By: Sally Wilton, 25 Aug 2008 I started out with enthusiasm with this book but should have read the title a little more carefully. A short 'history'of nearly everything with the emphasis on HISTORY. This book goes into great detail on how & when each new bit of information was discovered with biographies of the scientists involved. This was not really what I wanted to read about as would prefer just to know the latest most up to date information & there are plenty much more interesting books on these topics, I have been browsing the Lonely Planet version on space & science which is illustrated & topical. Dont wish to offend fans of Bill Bryson, it is probably my mistake.
How to learn very little about quite a lot - By: Mr. Tristan Martin, 24 Aug 2008 
Bill Bryson's book is an attempt to discuss the origins of life, the universe & everything contained therein. It's slightly tongue-in-cheek title indicates that this isn't going to be some heavyweight, academic discussion but more of a Now That's What I Call Science! After all, no book can seriously claim to be all-encompassing & completely comprehensive on any one subject, let alone "everything."
A Short History of Nearly Everything is clearly written to be a book that appeals to people who wouldn't normally want to read a whole book about gravity, molecular science, or paleontology; as a result, the book falls betwixt two stools: it skims superficially pretty much every subject it touches upon, so those only mildly interested won't learn much & those who have already read something on their specialised subject probably won't learn anything they didn't already know.
The first half of the book is the most interesting, containing some great anecdotes about the famous names of science (Newton, Darwin & so forth); this section shines & brings to life people whose names have become synonymous with their subject matter. However, as the various disciplines become more professionalised, the well of anecdotal material runs short, & the book loses much of its appeal.
One of the key themes of this work, which is not overtly stated but seems unmissable, is that the narrative of the history of science is quite different from how the mainstream media portrays science itself. Specifically, science is often presented as being the concept of a battle over evidence: how an idea is proposed, evidence is put forthin support, counterevidence is held up against it & ultimately, whichever theory fits most of the facts is deemed to be that which is most probable. This is not the case, according to Bryson's book. What is deemed to be scientifically true is determined just as much by factors of cultural acceptance as objective facts. Theories are put forth, ignored, then ridiculed, then, when the evidence becomes such that it can neither be marginalised nor mocked, the theory is embraced & history effectively rewritten so that science can be presented as being the onward march of progress & enlightenment. A reassuring but historically dubious narrative.
A Short History... is marketed around the "Bill Bryson" brand: his low-key charm, wit & self-effacing humour is meant to enliven the driest of subjects. Therefore, if you enjoy his style, then you will probably enjoy this book & indeed, the book was charmingly well written & certainly easy to consume. However, at best, A Short History of Nearly Everything is a shallow introduction to the key disciplines of the various sciences, animated by some fine anecdotal touches. Bryson's book will probably provide a drop-off point for those wishing to explorein greater breadth subjects of which their curiosity has been piqued.
